Monday, December 27, 2010

Cheats For Leaf Green Emulator



Posted by admin at 1:53 PM 0 comments

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Lub Marker Ski Bindings



WATER AND DRINKS


share a couple of videos on the deception of bottled water, the false advertising of soft drink, and in general, the reality on the supposed "environmental awareness" of big business.







Related Articles



"Donations", "condom" and other falsehoods about the alleged "debt" of Haiti ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/03/donaciones-condonaciones-y-otras.html ).



The Bible and the Koran Against Poverty and Hunger ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/11/la-biblia-y-el-coran-frente-la-pobreza.html .)
The contents of this feed is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike-2.5 Colombia. It allows free distribution the material in this feed, if not modified, is quoted http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com address as the source and the author's name (and the translator if any) of each item, and not get profit from it.
Posted by admin at 4:49 AM 0 comments

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Rikers Island Visiting Schedule.

interests and their role in the economy

INTERESTS AND THEIR ROLE IN THE ECONOMY AND THE LIFE

By Jamaal al-Din Zarabozo

Translation: Néstor Pedraza

The The following is an excerpt (fragments) of the translation of the original article.



The full article is available, including its footnotes, in http://www.islamreligion.com/es/articles/538/viewall/


The original English can be read in full in http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/538/viewall/


(© 2010 IslamReligion.com)


[...] The interest is something you know anyone live in a capitalist country. It has become so thoroughly institutionalized and accepted in modern economies, it is virtually impossible to conceive that anyone would oppose it by full and refuse any transaction involving interests. However, there are devout Muslims who refuse to deal with interest.

The real reason why these Muslims do not deal with interest is that the interest has been prohibited in Islam, as will be discussed shortly. At the same time, however, Muslims believe that God's guidance is based on His knowledge, wisdom and justice. In other words, God does not forbid something humans without a reason. Therefore, there is definitely a strong case, some of which we can clearly recognize, of why God has forbidden this practice. [...]

God's guidance for humanity

[...] many Muslims believe that there is no strong or convincing evidence that some of their religion is out of touch with reality or not feasible at the present time. In Islam, for example, has never been a conflict between religion and science that had led to a breakdown of trust in the church and a widespread revolt against the authority of religion, as in the West. Many people, including some Muslims, have called for many changes in Islam but in reality, the arguments presented for this have been flawed and weak, to say the least. The case of interest, the subject of this article may be taken as an excellent example of this kind. [...]

Religions, Philosophy and Interests

When you read Islamic texts concerning the interest, is immediately struck by the severity of the warnings against any participation in them. [...] This was Sayyid Qutb to write: "No other issue has been so strongly condemned and denounced in the Koran as usury." [...]

Just as a person insane unrestricted ordinary reason, resorts to all sorts of unconscionable acts, so does who takes interest. Pursues his craze for money as if he were insane. It ignores the fact that the interest cut the roots of human love, brotherhood and empathy, and undermines the welfare and happiness of human society, which is enriched at the expense of the welfare of many other human beings. [...]

Secondly, [...] there is a difference between legitimate business transactions and interest. [...] Thirdly, these verses clearly state that God "destroys interests and increases charities." This is one of the "laws" of God that humanity does not necessarily view itself. The devastating negative effects on the individual interests, community and the world in this life and in the latter are only known by God. However, a look at some of these negative effects demonstrates the truth of this verse, which will be given out later in this article. In fact, perhaps underlining the significance of this verse, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) also said: "The interests-even if a lot-will ultimately result in a small amount." Interest is definitely [...] harmful, and that is why they are prohibited. [...]

The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: "A penny of interest that is worn by a person knowing is worse in the eyes of God that 36 illegal sexual acts ". ( al-Hakim and al-Tabarani ) [...]

This is a basic principle in Islam. If something is forbidden and wrong, a Muslim should not participate or support it in any way. Therefore, since interest is forbidden, is also forbidden to witness in such contracts, records, etc. The Prophet's words also explain no difference between the payer and the recipient interests. This is because both are involved in a despicable practice and, therefore, are equally guilty. [...]

Islam, of course, is not the only religion that has forbidden interest and considered a despicable practice. The prohibition of interest-at least to some extent, is a well known law in both the Old and New Testament of the Bible. In many Old Testament passages referring to "usury" or "interest." (Again, usury and interest used to be equivalent, but only over time usury came to mean an exorbitant amount of interest or illegal ...) [...]

Easton's Bible Dictionary has summarized the Mosaic law on interest in the following passage: "The Mosaic Law requires that when an Israelite needed to borrow money, which will be provided free to ask and no interest will be charged, although interest may be charged to an alien (Exodus 22:25, Deuteronomy 23:19,20, Leviticus 25:35-38) . After seven years all debts are forgiven .[...]

Unfortunately, as often happens in politics, the New Testament is vague on the subject interest. according to the Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics , "there is no direct provisions [on the interests] to guide the Christian conscience." However, the teachings attributed to Jesus in the New Testament, there are some passages that appear to be clearly against the practice of interest. In one passage states that Jesus said

"You, however, love your enemies, let them give them good and lend, expecting nothing in return. So have a great reward and be sons of God, for He is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. " (Lucas 6:35) [...]

The Geneva Study Bible says: "[...] The usury or lending money at interest is strictly prohibited by the Bible (Exodus 22:25-27 , Deuteronomy 23:19,20). Even a rate as low as one per cent interest was rejected (Nehemiah 5:11). [...]"

Based on Old and New Testament, early Church Councils did not allow interest. Eventually, all Christians were prohibited from resorting to the interests, not just the clergy. Fathers of the Church, as St. Thomas Aquinas referred interests in some detail. "The Decree of Gratian, and after the Third Lateran Council (1179), a charge ordered 'manifest usurers shall not be admitted to communion, nor, if they die in their sin, receive Christian burial'." The Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 condemned the practice but allowed the Jews. Catholics stood firm against the interest until the nineteenth century. Martin Luther, the sixteenth century Protestant leader, also condemned usury, but allowed claims that in a moment of human weakness. Calvin, more than any other, was the pioneer vision softer than the interests among Christian leaders. Gradually the civil law of Canon Law was released and the interest began to be institutionalized over time.

was not only the Judeo-Christian thinkers who condemned the interest. In fact, Greek philosophers also had a negative view of the interest. Aristotle and other Greek scholars leaders condemned the interest. The famous Austrian economist Eugen von Böhm von Bawerk (also known as Boehm-Bawerk), wrote in his important work Capital and Interest "hostile expressions of the ancient world, not just numbers consist partly of a number of legislative acts prohibiting the taking of interest, and in part on statements by philosophers as Plato, Aristotle, both of Cato, Cicero, Seneca and Pantuso, etc. Greek philosophers considered the money as nothing more than a medium of exchange and, therefore, denied the productivity of borrowing money. A piece of money can not beget another piece, was the doctrine of Aristotle. The obvious conclusion was that the interest is unfair.

Initially, the Roman Empire banned the charging of interest. With the emergence of merchant classes, the ban was reduced a little, but still maintained tight restrictions on loans with interest, and laws to protect debtors.

Shakespeare's character, Shylock in The Merchant of Venice (written shortly before the year 1600) shows how lenders were despised dealing with interest. The obvious question that arises is how the interest went from being a despised and forbidden act to be socially acceptable and institutionalized practice in the West.

Over time, it was considered that the prohibition of interest was nothing more than a religious dogma to be eliminated. No could afford more than religion handle the economy. [...] At the same time, however, it seems that the attitude change that occurred was not based on purely economic grounds. Dennis Lawrence said:

"Aristotle, the Roman Catholic canon, the Jewish Torah ... all interest loans banned or denounced as usury interest. The interest loans raised in the Middle Ages, largely as a matter of serving the princes who needed and could not raise enough money for war and other public purposes. Contrary to current thinking, the loans were not originally developed as a form of commercial financing. The Venetians, Dutch, Hanseatic, British and other traders, until the seventeenth century to finance their operations with capital contributions from partners. "

Dennis further states:" The Canonical Catholics do not disapproved the benefits of commercial, rent for the land use or sale of the fruits of the land or other capital. They disapproved of the payment of interest on borrowed money. During the Reform Period, the interest became rationalized mainly by the Protestant canonical way to avoid objections. The Catholic Church never abandoned its attitude to usury, but consented to or allowed for loans based on certain assumptions. This consent Catholic Church's moral and positive feedback from traders Calvinist, became incorporated into the laws and thoughts and behavior patterns of modern societies. "

Rationalizations referred to Dennis can be seen in a series of commentaries on the Bible. Although the Old Testament texts are very clear in their condemnation of interest, this did not prevent the later scholars ignore or distort visibly ban. [... ]

[...] Even a famous economist was willing to provide commentaries. Paul Samuelson wrote in his classic text on economics: "The biblical expressions against interest and usury clearly refer to loans for consumption and not for investment purposes" [5].

Economic Theories and Interests
With the removal of objections "scholastic", became the role of the emerging science of economics to justify the payment of interest. This, apparently, is much more difficult than it seems. Haberler was certainly right when he said: "The theory of interest has long been a weak point in the science of economics, and the explanation and the determination of interest rates continues to result in more disagreement among economists that any other branch of general economic theory. "

In fact, among economists, "there is no single adequate and generally accepted theory of interest that may give a rational explanation for the origin and cause of interest."

The very plethora of opinions that attempt to explain the existence interests and justify their pay-accompanied by credible critics of all those notorious and respected economists, should be a signal to everyone that something is wrong. [...]

In a couple of places, Afzal-ur-Rahman has provided excellent conclusions about different theories of interest. He says:

A critical study of the history of the development of the phenomenon of interest has been shown that the interest is paid to an independent factor of production, which can be call waiting, delay, withdrawal, use, etc. . But all these theories have been unable to answer or prove why interest is paid or to be paid to this factor. Some point to the need to wait, others will need to abstain or delay, but none of these explanations answer the question. Neither the mere need to wait or postpone or abstain, or the mere use or productivity of capital are sufficient to prove that interest is a necessary payment for the use of capital in production. In addition, these theories have failed to explain how a variable factor in any way you can determine a fixed factor and the rate of interest. How could a theory be valid or sustainable? [...] Monetary theories, like theories of productivity marginal, have made no attempt to answer the question: why should they pay interest? Or, why do you pay interest? They simply ignore the question and take refuge in the theory of value. [...] According to Boehm-Bawerk, the study of all these theories "reveals the development of essentially three basic concepts of the problem of divergent interests" One group, the representatives of the productivity theory, addresses the problem of interests as a production problem. The exponents socialist theories of the operation address the problem of interest as merely a problem of distribution, while the third group, those who support monetary theories, looking at the interest theory of value problems. There is no doubt that all these theorists, having been confused by the magnanimity and the ubiquity of the phenomenon of interest, have avoided the main issue of why interest is paid. In fact, they have invested all their energies on solving the problem of waiting or abstinence or productivity or value of work "or" determination of value ", and have not said anything about the origin or justification for the institution of interest .

Evils of interests

Economists can try to reach many justifications for the payment of interest, but the real test lies in the study of the effects of interest. It is important to note that when something is forbidden by God, this does not mean that anything is beneficial in the case or practice prohibited. In fact, one may be able to find something good even in the forbidden things. [...] Therefore, the essential point is not whether there is any benefit in something but whether it is more harmful than beneficial. So the economists may be able to find a hint of justification for the payment of interest, but this definitely is not greater than the damage that it can be shown to cause interest, as discussed in this section.

Even if the interest is considered some kind of payment by a factor of production, have some characteristics that distinguish them from the payment by any other factor of production. Due to its unique nature, lead to some very troubling.

First, interest lead to an inequitable distribution of income. This can be seen easily by taking an example of three people. Suppose there are three people who consume all their income in a given year, and one of them starts with $ 1,000 in savings, the second with $ 100 and the third with zero. At 10%, at year's end the first person to have $ 1,100, second $ 110 and the third zero on their accounts. If it stays the same situation next year, the first person to have $ 1,210, second $ 121 and the third will be zero. We can see how the distribution between them grows every year, even between those who have some savings in your account. This scenario is compounded if the richest person is also able to increase their savings. Suppose that the richest adds thousands to the end of each year will be $ 1,100 at the end of the first year, add $ 1,000 to continue its 10% interest and to be $ 2,310 at the end of the second year, and so on. Now this is one thing if this money was actually paid on account to a positive factor of production, but in reality one can not argue such a thing in this case. The money people are making through interest may have been wasted, lost or even stolen by people who borrowed it, but even so one must pay the interest. It may have been invested in a project that shows only losses and therefore does not produce anything. But none of that matters, must be paid regardless of whether that "factor of production" produces anything or not. This is just one particular aspect of money and cash payments. No one can argue that this is unfair and therefore their results are an inequitable distribution of money.

Moreover, income distribution becomes more and more unequal over time. One can imagine some people driving millions while others handle hundreds or thousands. The disparity in interest income is indeed large and growing each year. In other words, as we hear often, this leads to a situation in which the rich become richer and the poor are relatively poorer. Consider that the debtors, who pay interest growing every year, have been added to the equation. Where appropriate, to the extent that interest continues to grow, your total income is increasingly consumed by the interests, further exacerbating the unequal distribution of income.

One might ask whether an unequal distribution of income should be considered a major problem. In addition to the psychological effects on the poor, especially when you consider the media to highlight the good life and the need to eat, there are very significant impact on the market as a whole. In a market economy, production is geared towards those who have money to pay for what is produced, regardless necessary as they can be other assets to society. If the rich want, demand and are willing to pay big bucks for big SUVs and gas-guzzling vehicles, they will be produced (regardless of how much the environmentalists to complain). As the distribution becomes more and more unequal, more and more resources will be allocated to meet the demands of the wealthier classes. Since resources are somewhat "fixed", meaning that fewer and fewer will be dedicated to meeting the needs of the poorer classes. On the other hand, the least amount of resources devoted to goods consumed by the poor, lowers and raises your bid prices of such goods, which further undermines the overall economic situation of the poor. For example, one can find numerous medical clinics catering to the rich (those who can afford such treatments), but are far from necessary, as many areas of cosmetic surgery and the like. At the same time, one can find very difficult to find clinics that serve the poor and meeting their basic needs. If they could pay more for these essential services in a market-driven economy, you definitely find more clinics like this, more resources devoted to these needs and prices lower in the long run for what they need. (In addition, this uneven distribution also has strong implications for the health of democracy, however, that discussion is beyond the scope of this article.)

addition, the interest burden on the poor who fall into debt puts them in a situation where they can not advance socially or economically, increasing the gap between rich and poor. The debt itself is a difficult situation for anyone. However, interest payments are those that convert the debt into a moving target, often one that the person simply can not continue. Again, it is a false factor of production but it works to let the rich get richer while posing a great burden on those who fall into debt. Perhaps all readers are familiar with the company highly indebted U.S., the richest country in the world has done. This has affected not only the lower classes but many of the middle classes. Some people afflicted do not realize that if they make only minimum payments on the accounts of their credit cards, for example, never clear your balance. But, of course, are the poorest the hardest hit. In fact, the system is wroth against them, because the poor is the person with the worst credit rating and will be forced to pay higher interest rates. Shahjahan Mirza's book Income, Debt and the Quest for the American Rica: The Economic History of the Medium and Small Cities U.S. is a study of how the debt and associated interest burden has affected much of the "class average "American." The plight of small farmers forced to borrow due to falling prices of its production has been well documented. Many of them have committed their precious goods or lost their farms, which had been in their families for generations, simply due to interest payments which could not keep pace. Shahjahan found that some of the poor pay more than 15% of their annual income on interest payments alone (with most of the poor paying between 8% and 12%)-not to mention the load of calls and threats from creditors that poor people often receive. The conclusions of Shahjahan, he says:

Both monetary and the real burden of debts have kept many debtors in a struggle all their lives to service debt. The average size of the debt of indebted households in 1990-1993 was U.S. $ 32,493, equivalent to almost 100% of income of those households. Our estimate of per capita debt households for 1990-1993 is U.S. $ 12,571. A debt of this magnitude, combined with a temporary work and low income, can be depressing and overwhelming psychological conditions produce ...

Interest payments for some households, exceeding its income by 15% This interest cost high has been a source of significant erosion of household income.

Most home-million of them-in medium cities, struggle daily to meet their basic living needs. Thousands of them fail to provide a decent life for their family or provide higher education for their children. They live in debt and die in debt. This situation makes them feel they do not lead a full life ...

These households are trapped in a situation of economic servitude in which the most obvious escape routes are blocked by institutional forces. The acquisition of skills or higher education could be the key to open real opportunities for them, but higher education is expensive and is beyond the reach of most households in these cities. Such homes do not have opportunities to excel and find that they have been passed over for positions they crave. This is the nature of the plight of working class families in small towns and medium-sized U.S..

Internationally, the situation is much more devastating and dangerous. There is no doubt that when viewed from an international perspective, the interests kill people. Debt bondage to the least developed countries today is so great that they are forced to sacrifice basic needs in health and nutrition. It is galling to think that an untold number of children die daily in developing countries due to the "tool" of modern capitalism: interests. Some African governments are forced to spend more on paying debt than they spend on health or education.

In this context, UNDP (1998) predicted that if the external debt of 20 poorest countries in the world to be condoned, it would save the lives of 20 million people by 2000. In other words, this means that the debt is not forgiven was responsible for the deaths of 130,000 children every week until 2000 .

Ken Livingston, Mayor of London, said that global capitalism kills more people annually than those who were killed by Adolf Hitler. He blamed the IMF and the World Bank for the deaths of millions of people due to its refusal to ease the burden of debt. Susan George said that every year since 1981, between 15 and 20 million people die unnecessarily because of debt burden, "because Third World governments have had to reduce potable water and health programs to meet their payments. "

debt, with its associated increasing amount of interest, it is dangerous for any nation because it means loss of sovereignty and control. This aspect, of course, is no accident. The least developed countries-especially their rulers and upper classes corrupt, not free of guilt in relation to the issue of the debt they have accumulated. At the same time, if not ask for and get the debt, will definitely be pressured to do so. Caufield said:

It has been with the World Bank, refund transactions have been increasing their total loans. The result has been an accumulation of debt by the Bank owed, and a consequent gradual loss of sovereignty. No creditor is willing to extend time and again the time for payment of debt without ensuring some control over how the debtor manages its business. In the early days the great powers did not hesitate to use military force to subdue recalcitrant debtors to his will. In his classic essay "Public Debts," published in 1887, the American economist Henry Carter Adams wrote that "the granting of foreign credits is the first step towards the establishment of an aggressive foreign policy, and under certain conditions, will inevitably lead to the conquest and occupation. "

The Bank's approach to debtors is not as raw. Instead of sending the Marines, offers advice on how countries should manage their finances, make laws, provide services to their people and manage themselves in the international market. His powers of persuasion are great because of the universal belief that if the Bank decides to ostracize a borrower, all other major national and international powers will follow the same line. Therefore, due to excessive loans, born to an underlying inconsistency in its mission, the Bank has added its own power, while it has depleted its borrowers.

The now famous book John Perkins Confessions of an Economic Hitman details the contemporary economic intrigue. In describing its evaluation of projects, wrote:

The unspoken aspect of each of these projects was that they intended to create huge profits for contractors, and very happy to do a handful of wealthy and influential families in host countries, while ensuring the long-term financial dependence and therefore the political loyalty of governments around the world. The higher off the loan, the better. The fact that the debt burden placed on a country would deprive its poorest citizens of health, education and other social services for decades, was not taken into account.

Perkins's work has been followed by A game as old as the Empire: The Secret World of Economic Hitmen and Red Global Corruption, edited by Steven Hiatt. [8] Hiatt writes:

keeps debt of Third world under control. Dependent on grants, loans refinancing, renewals and debt to survive, regardless of their real development-have been forced to restructure their economies and rewrite its laws to meet the conditions of structural adjustment programs of IMF and World Bank conditions.

The current debt situation, with the leading role that the interests are playing in it is potentially very devastating to the world. 2015 Global Trends In , the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) acknowledged:

The rising tide of the global economy will create many economic winners, but not yet lifted all boats. Generate local and foreign conflicts, ensuring a gap between regional winners and losers widening that exists today. The evolution of globalization will be unstable, marked by chronic financial volatility and growing economic gaps. Regions, countries and groups have been feeling left behind will face deepening economic stagnation, political instability and cultural alienation. It will promote political extremism, ethnic, ideological and religious, along with the violence that often accompanies it.

Noreena Hertz has an excellent chapter in his book The Debt Threat: How debt is destroying the developing world ... and threatens us all, which outlines many of the dangers of debt mass-and again, it would not be so massive without the ever-growing aspect of interest, represents today's world. She details the dangers of extremism, terrorism, depletion of global natural resources, and more. To cite just one aspect, she writes:

The ugly progeny of the debt-poverty, inequality and injustice, they are called to justify, and even to legitimize acts of extreme violence. Just weeks ago, was attacked the World Trade Center. The major African commentator Michael Fortin wrote: "We must recognize that this deplorable act of aggression might have been, at least in part, an act of revenge by people desperate and humiliated, crushed by the weight of economic oppression practiced by the peoples of the West. "The language of Fortin -" crushed, "" oppression, "" desperate, "" humiliated "- is deliberately evocative. And it is manifestly clear that there is an audience to which those words will resonate powerfully. [...]

Islamic Solution

The Islamic solution to the issue of interest is based on two basic principles:

(1) If a person wants to lend money to another to help her, this act must be based on "principles fraternal "and is absolutely unacceptable to charge any interest in this case. It does not help another person office with a debt cycle in which it must pay more than you borrowed. [...]

(2) If a person wants to use their money to make more money, then you must be willing to put their money at risk. In other words, can not by itself guarantee a fixed return (the amount increases with time) that is independent of investment performance in which their money is used. If the person puts their money at risk, deserves to share in the profits. However, this also means that you agree to lose if there are losses. This is a system that is based on justice. It also has many benefits. Who cares reverses the results of your investment and can not demand his "piece of cake" regardless of what may happen with the debtor.

Islamic
This solution works for both individuals and society as a whole. [...]

Conclusions

the most part, the "modern civilization" has decided to give back to the Divine Guidance (mostly due to the experience in the West with Cristiano ) and have tried to build their own economic and political systems, international law and others. In doing so, however, had to admit that they're trying something that is beyond their capabilities. The social sciences are very different from the physical sciences. There are no laboratories in which humans can be entered to determine what may be the best results under different scenarios (and even have to assume that humans will always react the same way low the same circumstances.)

In the field of economics, the first thing that comes to mind is the collapse of the theories of socialism and communism. One must, however, also take a closer look at capitalism and how far is the reality of what is supposed to be. The early capitalist theorists envisioned a theory that would lead to "best of all possible worlds." However, his theories were based on assumptions that never were and never will be fulfilled. They assumed perfect competition, perfect knowledge, free trade and so on. Once these assumptions are violated, as they inevitably did not lead to the best of all possible worlds. " Instead, easily lead to a world of exploitation, in which the rich get richer the poor get poorer. One of the forces underlying this system is the institutionalization of interest.

God has blessed human beings with the guidance of the Qur'an-a book that has been carefully preserved since its revelation. This book contains the guidance that humanity needs to live a successful life in this world and beyond. Therefore, it is not surprising that this book absolutely prohibit and condemn interests in the most radical.

Related Articles


"Donations", "condom" and other falsehoods about the alleged "debt" of Haiti ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/03/donaciones-condonaciones-y-otras.html ) .




Market

Sir
Bernard Shaw, a socialist atheist Christian writer who flirted with Islam ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/02/sir-bernard-shaw-un-escritor-cristiano.html ).

Unemployment and Lawlessness ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/11/desempleo-e-iniquidad.html ).



The contents of this feed is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike-2.5 Colombia. It allows free distribution the material in this feed, if not modified, is quoted http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com address as the source and the author's name (and the translator if any) of each item, and not get profit from it.
Posted by admin at 11:12 AM 0 comments

Monday, November 22, 2010

Buffie The Bodyand Pinky

life and Colombia: Two facets

COLOMBIA: TWO FACES

share two videos about the reality of this country. The first is an optimistic view of a Colombian of Japanese ancestry, who performed community work in one of the poorest sectors of Bogota. The second, a complaint about the reality of gold mining in Colombia, commercial which was banned in the country.









Related Articles

Reading economy Rodolfo Llinas ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/ 11/leyendo-la-economia-de-rodolfo-llinas.html ).

The Fallacy of "Islamic Banking" ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/03/la-falacia-de-la-banca-islamica.html ).

Islam and Real Money (http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/03/islam-y-el-dinero-real.html).

Hacker Manifesto ( Http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2011/02/manifiesto-hacker.html ).

interests and their role in the economy and the life ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/11/los-intereses-y-su-papel-en-la-economia.html ).

fundamental incompatibility between Nationalism and Pacifism ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/11/incompatibilidades-fundamentales-entre.html ).

Islam and International Law ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/11/el-islam-y-el-derecho-internacional.html ).
The contents of this feed is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike-2.5 Colombia. It allows the free distribution of material in this feed, if not modified, is quoted http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com address as the source and the author's name (and the translator if necessary ) for each item, and do not get profit from it.
Posted by admin at 8:51 PM 0 comments

Best Oil To Elongate Labia

Sex and the single Muslim

Sex and the single Muslim

Written by a Muslim woman who prefers not to disclose his name.

Taken http://www.islamweb.net/esp/print.php?id=152820&lang=S


Let's talk about something that nobody else wants to talk. Unmarried women and sex ...

We must be very clear on this matter: we all need love, each and every one of us, all we need to feel loved and have that special closeness. It is a natural part of human beings is how we were created and there is nothing wrong with that, there is nothing to be ashamed if you have these feelings. What is not natural is to be a celibate for life (for no good reason) ... that's just wrong.

But perhaps temporary celibacy is not a bad thing, that is, when you're a single woman ... there is no other option. Go into the reasons for this later, because there is much more than what someone might think. Then, when you are a Muslim, single, how you handle it? This can be very lonely, very tedious. What to do? How do you cope?

is not easy ... and there is no simple solution, but one ... and marriage.


Love is sexy, but what sex is love?

The whole idea of \u200b\u200bfalling in love with someone is really very attractive ... it's incredibly attractive. May Allah help us all, we are so bombarded with this idea at every turn! Is on TV, even in animated films for children. I mean, if those ridiculous cars can fall in love, why I can not find the love of my life? At least I am a human being!

Love is idealized, especially in the West. Is sold and promoted in every way imaginable ... and I have to give a lecture about it, you know it's true. But what is really sad, is that advertising (among other things) has confused sex with love, and by no means the same thing. Everyone can have sex, but not everybody can have love. In Islam there is great reward linked to marriage, and sexual needs of a person by the sanctity and unity of marriage is doubly rewarded: physical and spiritual.

True love is not born, at least for the most part, at first sight. The first views are just the day before. What happens at first sight is desire and desire alone. It is the physical attraction that attracts the interest at first, not love.


vs True love. desire

Someone once sent me a poem to work, and this is what he said: "All love that has no friendship as its base is like a mansion built on sand" quoted by Ella Wheeler Wicox. I sat at my computer thinking, "That is very true. Nothing else can be so clear. "

Love is built over time through mutual understanding and care ... does not happen in a few interactions. The desire, on the other hand, can start and end in an instant. Love is lasting, while the desire is temporary. Love is patient, tools that desire is impatient and impulsive. Love makes you feel happy and inspired, while the desire only offers shame repentance.

One thing is certain: love and desire never to be confused.

The quote I'll use below provides much clarity on the subject of love and desire:

"You know what love is?
is all the kindness and generosity.

Discord prevails when You confuse the desire to love,
As the distance between them is infinite. " (Rumi)

This line catches my attention in particular: "... the distance between them is infinite" ... how true it is.

The single Muslim must be constantly alert to avoid confusing the two emotions, and sometimes this can be difficult if you are alone.


One solution to loneliness

Marriage is a very good alternative. Muslim women should avoid living single for a long time. In Islam, being married or is half of religion. The Prophet Muhammad (blessings and peace of God be upon him) said: "Marriage is my way (ie, my Sunna), and a person who despises my way does not belong to mine" (Compiled by Bukhari).

therefore, to live single for a long period of time is Haram, if not, something that goes against the Sunnah of the Prophet (BYP).

However, we know that women can do it. We earn our own money we can raise their children and homemakers. There is nothing we can not do for ourselves ... well, almost nothing. We can not be parents. No woman can replace a father. We can try if we have to, but not the same.

Like everyone else, we need the family union. Our children need a united family, and a close family includes a mother and a father, a husband and wife.

For men and women living alone and unmarried, only invites the sin. We can be strong for some time, but eventually Satan will start to whisper, and the longer we stay alone, the stronger their whispers.

"The person who tries to live alone will not succeed as a human being. His heart withers if it does not answer another heart. His mind shrinks if you only hear the echoes of his own thoughts and finds no other inspiration. " "By Pearl S. Buck.

do not know much about Pearl Buck, but this is right.


True Love Waits

So what to do about marriage? How to find a partner? How can we achieve true love through a marriage contract?

If you are a single Muslim and want to marry for the sake of Allah (and I know it can be hard to do), do not start looking on-line. Visit your community, talk to your friends. Make a list of things that interest you and then you'll know about what to discuss. Be your own research, look for it among friends of the friends of your friends. I know this may sound obsessive, but, after all, this is someone with whom you are considering spending the rest of your life.

And once you decide to meet someone, talk about things in your list and make sure you have some things in common, now and for the future. Common goals always enhance a relationship.

The Islamic contract of marriage and the ceremony itself may seem very dry compared to the lavish ceremony that we see on television. But what matters is the intention and sincerity.

Here's another quote that I love, by Thomas Carlyle: "The merit of originality is not novelty, is sincerity."

This aspect is more important than the world when you look for life partner.

Does love come with a marriage contract? To be honest, the answer is no, not always. But on average, studies show that these types of marriages are lasting. I know you've heard this a million times, but develop a bond of friendship with your husband is what will endure. The attraction comes and goes with time, but a strong friendship and love only are strengthened.

is my hope that this article helps those who are still single and think a little beyond what we already know about the difference between desire and love.

True love and sexual happiness waiting for you by sincere union of marriage, and that's something that really is worth waiting for. And safeguard your dignity and self is essential for your mental well-being and that of your children, if one day you incha Al-Lah.

Always keep this in your mind as you spend your life as a single woman: you are Muslim and accept something less than the sincerity of a marriage Islam is simply far below you.

And then seriously start looking for a good Muslim to marry my friend, because Satan never sleeps.


Related Articles






The false case of marriage than 450 children in Gaza ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/11/el-falso-caso-del-matrimonio-de-450.html ).

rent




The contents of this feed is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike-2.5 Colombia. It allows the free distribution of material in this feed, if not modified, the address is mentioned http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com as the source and the author's name (and the translator if any) of each item, and will not get profit from it.
Posted by admin at 7:26 AM 0 comments

Sunday, November 21, 2010

Can Lamisil Users Donate Blood Donation

On fight under the command of unbelievers

Clarification on Helping Fatwa Jizbul-Lah (Hizbullah - Hezbollah), fighting under his direction and make Dua (supplication) for them to victory and its strengthening.



Public this fatwa not their particular content, but the relevance of his explanation for the fallacy of the "union Shia - Sunni" and position of Muslim scholars with respect to associate with unbelievers. Emphasize the difference between respecting the dignity of every human being, and fight alongside unbelievers and / or under the direction and flag (including nationalism and the fight in armies who swear allegiance to a different God and fight for a cause different from God).


Fatwa Number: 4174

Fatwa Theme: Help Jizbul-Lah to Rafidah and fight under his leadership, and make Dua (supplication) for them to victory and strength.

Question: Recently there have been many people who call (invitation) to assist Lebanon Jizbul-Lah. Rafidi This group funded by Iran.

Answer: And we wonder: Is it possible to help this group Rafidi? Is it allowed to fight under your leadership? Are you allowed to make Dua for his victory and empowerment? And what is your advice regarding which delude them from Ajlul Sunna?

is not allowed to help this group Rafidi, nor is it allowed to fight under his direction (Emir, no flag), nor is it allowed to make Dua (supplication) for them to victory and its strengthening.

Ajlul Our advice to the Sunna is to depart from them, that leave their supporters, and we expose the great hatred of the Rafidah have with Islam and Muslims, the wickedness of the (Rafidah) both past and present on Ajlul Sunna.

The Rafidah always want hostility (bad) to Ajlul Sunna., And whenever possible, take public birth defects Ajlul Sunna, to insult and hate. And if so, the thing, anyone who is allied with them (Jizbul-Lah-Rafidah) is theirs (it has the same name), under the aayah

"... One of you who ally with them will be one of them ...." (Sura The Table, Aleya 51).

RabdaRahman ibn Abdullah ibn Jibreen.


CLARIFICATIONS Fatu

In the name of God, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

Many Muslims around the world have not understood the Fatwa of Cheikh Jibreen, and have been quick to criticize and reject it without providing any arguments.

The verdict issued by Cheikh ibn Jibreen and according to Aquida of Ajlul Sunna wal Yamá to understand the Fatwa should know the following:

First .- First, any person who has knowledge and has reached the category of Cheikh (Sage) deserves respect and above all thanks for all your efforts on behalf of Islam. As a jadiz says the Prophet (peace and blessings of God be upon him) "... scholars are the heirs of the prophets ...." Tirmidhi and Ibn Hibbaan.

The scholars are in the best condition have to talk about Islam and are better prepared. It is good to note that if a Chej in their verdicts, opinions or advice should always provide arguments from the Qur'an and Sunnah, and if not provides, will always be (his iytijad) his effort in their research that if you hit will double merit if not hit. But always the words of a Sage is more valuable than one that is not, as they always have a large margin and will be more proactive to meet the Sage all the knowledge he possesses.

Second .- The Cheikh ibn Jibreen, before issuing its verdict has been investigated in many books and have read of other scholars on Rafidas, among the scholars who have spoken on the Chias Rafidas we have: Cheikh ibn Imaam, Ibn Kathir, Imam Malik, Al Qurtubi, Abu Khatim, Said Al Asbahani, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Ibn Hazm, Abu Zar'aa Razi, have agreed to that are Unbelievers Rafidah (Kufar) and have perverted Islam and have filled with idolatry, lying and cursing the Sajaba, changing the Quran and declaring unbelievers all they are not Chia, ie the Sunna Ajul for Shia (Rafidah) are unbelievers (kuffar), our blood is legal, property and honor for Rafidah.

proof is the following book and bibliography therein contained:
Beliefs of the Shiites 'Min' Aqa'id to Shi'a. " Author: Muhammad ibn Muhammad as Salafi.

Third .- The Chej in its response, only responded to what was asked and the questions were concise and specific: In this question is asked three questions: Help Jizbul-Lah fight under their flag and make Dua for them.

And Cheikh has responded to these three issues. While a Fatwa is not going to write a book bringing all the arguments and all that other scholars have said about the Chej responded specifically to the three questions by saying that:

- On-Jizbul help Allah: He said is not allowed, as helping someone who has a deviant aquida full of idolatry and ally with them as friends is a ban, as the verse: "... one of you who ally with them will be one of them ..." . (Sura The Table, Aleya 51).

union and support among Muslims must be about the truth not the falsehood, and these idolaters Rafidis practice something that is not Islam, because they have changed everything, have been withdrawn and added pillars Islam as they wanted (for example, a pilgrimage to Mecca, for them is to make the pilgrimage shrine of Ali (may God be pleased with him).

addition, you can not help this group Rafidi, Rafidah as for anyone who is not Chia believeth and his blood is lawful, that is, one that helps, do not doubt that they can use this helps against him, since history, facts and sages have reported that Rafidis have fought against Ajlul Sunna and consider unbelievers and their blood is legal, property and honor.

respect to help each other Muslim countries: it is mandatory, and if someone goes too far you must fight, as quoted in the Qur'an:

Sura the Chambers: Aleya 9
"And if two parties of believers fight each other, attempts to reconcile. If one of the two acts abusively against the other, fight the oppressor group to respect the laws God has established, and if it does, then reconcile both groups equally. Be just, for God loves those who justice. "

This verse states that if two Muslim groups fighting, must be reconciled, and if any of them acts wrongfully must fight the oppressor group. But when it comes to a Muslim group and other group or non-Muslim country, the support among Muslims is compulsory and must fight the attacking group.

El Cheikh ibn Jibreen said that is not allowed to help Jizbul-Lah, but it is permissible to assist Lebanon to repel the aggression, since it is a Muslim country, and help is required between them. However, remember that the Jizbul-Lah refused the help offered to him by Ajlul Sunna Muslims of Lebanon.

- Compared to fight under their flag or Address: the Cheikh said he is not allowed to fight under his direction, because the battles we must obey the Amir, and for Ajlul Sunna is not allowed to have a deflected aquida Emir, therefore, can not be Sunni Muslims under the leadership of Emir Rafidi Chia, since they are unbelievers, a Muslim must not be under the direction and command and flags of unbelievers and idolaters (polytheists) .

According to Islam, when a town is invaded or attacked externally every Muslim must do Jihad (fardu a'in) (general obligation), all people must fight to defend themselves and to repel the aggression they suffer. And in this case in Lebanon all must repel the aggression and fight the enemy. The Muslims of Lebanon should be under control Ajlul Sunna Emir of which must follow, as it is, and is a cornerstone in the Jihad. And in this case becomes generic fight against the Zionist aggressors, but never with a group (Jizbul-Lah), flag, or something else, but the fight must be Fisabilil-Lah (for the sake of God), seeking the pleasure of God, since it is an obligation for every Muslim fight when there is aggression and must defend Islam.

Of all the sins the more severe the Chirk (idolatry), and this group has the flag idolatry, even when I say that is the party of God, as their actions and beliefs are unbelievers and idolaters. That's why he is under their flag recognizes and assimilates Rafidis belief, which is unbelief and idolatry, and this is one of the gravest sins, if it is the most serious, since it leads to eternal hell maker . God forgives everything except idolatry, as stated in the Qur'an:

Sura of Women: Aleya 48.
"God does not forgive associating him nothing, but He forgives whom He pleases. Up partners to God who commits a grave sin. "

And who knowingly do so will deserve the punishment of fire eternal, as people will also be resurrected with the people they love or sympathize, and who loves or sympathize with Rafidis be raised among them and be in the house of idolaters and disbelievers in Hell, according jadiz quotes:
From Ibn Mas'ud, may God be pleased with him, saying,
The Messenger of God, God bless him and give him peace: 'The man will be with those he loved'. "I told Al-Bukhari and Muslim.

El Cheikh ibn Jibreen, in his Fatwa only responded to what was asked specifically, fighting under the flag of Jizbul-Lah, to which he replied that it is not allowed, be permissible to fight the Zionists to repel aggression under the leadership of Emir of Ajlul Sunna.

- Compared to make Dua (supplication) to Jizbul-Lah: not allowed to make Dua (supplication) for Jizbul-Lah, and you can not ask God to give victory to a group that is unbeliever, idolater (not Muslim). Those are Rafidis Jizbul-Lah, his Aquida (Beliefs) all are innovative, polytheists, and full of disbelief. The Sages of the catalog Islam as hypocrites and idolaters counterfeiters. The sages have spoken about Rafidas who are liars, insult Sajaba are idolaters, and are far from the Sunnah, have completely distorted Islam and is the reigning idolatry in their beliefs and are more pagan than those Kuraich possessed of Mecca 14 centuries ago.

the scholars of Islam have told us that we turn away from them, they do not believe, and that we relate to them, how will it be possible to make Dua for them? The Rafidis know the truth but hiding because their beliefs are lawful hypocrisy (taquiya) to know the enemy and be able to betray.

Cheikh ibn Jibreen The answer is not allowed to make Dua for Jizbul-Lah, you can not make Dua specifically to a certain group such as Jizbul-Lah, but has to make Dua saying that God give victory to the Muslims (not to mention Jizbul-Lah) since there are Muslims in Lebanon who are fighting (Sunnis) and people do not know. DUA is that God gives victory to Muslims and Islam, and to defeat the Zionists. But never make dua expressly Jizbul-Lah, since it is not allowed, and it seems that there is only this group and that is wrong. Furthermore, this group has no part in Islam. We can not ask God (exalted and glorified be) by whom He commits the most hate the association. Associated with their Imams stating that God possess the same powers as God (blessed and exalted). This is not another name association. Chirk.

And God is the Provider of all success and all of Victoria.

hope that these clarifications serve those who have not understood the Fatwa, since issued a Fatwa Chej only two paragraphs, did not write books to explain everything, which is why it is not good to rush and draw conclusions quickly, but it's always good to ask and investigate the reasons for their verdict. And who knows the Aquida of Rafidas then know and understand better the Fatwa. May God guide us to the straight path and Final Victory. Amin.



Related Articles

Join the Ummah not mix Islam with other sects and religions ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/12/unir-la-ummah-no-es-mezclar-islam-con.html ).

On Infallibility. Dr. 'Omar Sulaiman Al Ashqar. Http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/12/sobre-la-infalibilidad.html .

Shiism is not Islam. Ibn al-Hashimi. Http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2009/11/el-chiismo-no-es-islam.html .
Searching for the Truth and seeks to accommodate the Truth ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/08/pedir-pruebas-es-un-dalil-claro-de-tu.html ).

The hidden truth of the matter evolves. Dr. Ibrahim Canan. Http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/06/la-verdad-oculta-del-asunto-de-muta.html .



The contents of this feed is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike-2.5 Colombia. It allows the free distribution of material in this feed, if not modified, is quoted http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com address as the source and the author's name (and the translator if necessary ) for each item, and do not get profit from it.
Posted by admin at 3:04 PM 0 comments

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Kurdish Clothes For Babies

supernatural in animal

the supernatural in the Animal

By: Irichc

http://es.paperblog.com/lo-sobrenatural-en-lo-animal-26285 Taken


remember Bacon:

Those who deny God destroy man's nobility, for certainly man is of the lineage of the animals because of their body, and if not the spirit of God would be a low and miserable creature. Also destroys the magnanimity and emerging human nature. To take the example of a dog, suffice it to what generosity and courage will use when underpinned by a man, who holds for him instead of a god or melior natura; courage that would not show if it had the certainty of a better nature than yours ever could acquire.

What I recall after reading Konrad Lorenz:

No default instinct leans the dog to lay his head on the knee of his master, and for this reason that such an action bears a closer relationship with our human language than wild animals "are saying" between them.

The dog, in relation to the master, adopting a language that is somewhat creative, open to experience and intelligence, rather than a mere hindrance in their DNA. Lorenz contends that if these results can not be replicated in a scientific environment in the case of the missing dog is incentive for this was the everyday space of submission to the owner, very difficult to translate into the artificial conditions of laboratory. In particular, he writes:

is still too early to compare the dog with the great apes, but I think the dog will prove to be more suitable for the understanding of human speech, however much the ape can overtake in other intellectual abilities.

But the dog is not a monkey and do not seem to merit or one hundred thousandth of the attention that they now monopolize. What is simple for the Darwinian determinism by kinship, namely, sensitivity, empathy and a certain capacity for abstraction, for the ethologist is a cultural breakthrough in a brutish to the treatment continued with a melior natura transformed over the generations. The emphasis in the chimpanzee and the stifling role that appears to give scientific mandarins should be, then, to the genetic fallacy, the militant materialism and contempt for priests profess evolution toward spirit.

----------
Related Articles

About

Cause and Effect as the Fundamentalist Christians ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/06/causa-y-efecto-segun-los.html ).


Sir Bernard Shaw, a socialist atheist Christian writer who flirted with Islam ( http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com/2010/02/sir-bernard-shaw-un-escritor-cristiano.html ).



The contents of this feed is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike-2.5 Colombia. It allows the free distribution of material in this feed, if not modified, is quoted http://mensajesenlaruta.blogspot.com address as the source and the author's name (and the translator if necessary ) for each item, and do not get profit from it.
Posted by admin at 9:03 PM 0 comments

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Yasai Katsu Curry Sauce Recipe



Posted by admin at 12:22 AM 0 comments

Chemotherapy After The Whipple Procedure/

bull sale


selling bulls of different irons and economic of different irons
Posted by admin at 12:11 AM 0 comments

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

White Lump On Gold Fish

GREAT HOUSE 3 BEDROOMS IN B ° VILLA CORINA - CORDOBA

HOUSE 3 bedroom with closet, kitchen, living room, bathroom zoned, garage, BBQ .- NATURAL GAS, ALARM, TELEPHONE .- SUP COVER MS 160, CUB. FIELD SUP MS 260,
PRICE: $ 1,700 PER MONTH .-
REQUIREMENTS: MES MES
MAKING ADVANCE .- .-
CONTRACT OWNER OR WARRANTIES WITH RECEIPT OF SALARY .- CONTACT: ROBERTO MISER
E MAIL: robertoavaro@yahoo.com.ar
CEL: 0351-156522983
Posted by admin at 4:04 PM 0 comments
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)